Category: Research Opportunity Program

Posted on

Manav Shah’s Journey in ROP399

Hi! My name is Manav Shah, and I am finishing the third year of Computer Science Specialist and Statistics Minor at UofT. This past academic year, I had the opportunity to do an ROP399 research project under the guidance of Professor Pascal Tyrrell, and I would like to share experience on this blog.

My ROP project dealt with comparing the effect of decrease in sample size on Vision Transformer’s against Convolutional Neural Networks on a Chest X-Ray classification task using the NIH Chest X-Ray dataset. Convolutional Neural Networks have been predominantly used in medical imaging tasks as they are easy to train and perform very well with any image modality. However, in recent years, Vision Transformers (ViTs) have been shown to outperform on Convolutional Neural Networks. However, they have only been shown to do so only when trained/pretrained on extremely large amounts of data. Given that large amounts of labelled data are hard to come by in the field of Medical Imaging, it is important to set up some baselines for performance and gauge whether future work and research is warranted in this arena. This exploratory aspect made my project very exciting.

I started the project not knowing anything about ViTs. I had some experience training and using CNNs or Resnets before. Thus, I started with reading up everything I could about Vision Transformers. However, since it is a relatively new class of models, it was hard to gain an initial intuitive understanding of what was happening in the research papers I read. I did not know where I should start. To not waste time, I started by cleaning my data and preparing a binary classification dataset from the NIH Chest X-Ray dataset, to detect infiltration within the lungs. I trained a small CNN classifier from scratch to see if the results made sense. I was getting an accuracy of around 60%, which I knew was not good enough. Then, I spoke to Prof. Tyrrell and Atsuhiro, who pointed to the fact that my dataset might have some noise relating to the same patients being in the positive and negative class of images. Thus, I cleaned my data some more and made sure there was little correlation between the negative and positive class of images.

I then proceeded to train a small CNN again, with fair results. However, when I tried training a ViT from scratch on my datasets, it would only learn to output “No Infiltration” for all images as that was the majority class. So, I did some more research and tried a lot of different techniques, but to no avail. However, in trying to debug the ViT model, I gained an in-depth understanding of some concepts like learning rate scheduling, training regimes, transfer learning, self-attention etc. I learned a lot from a lot of failures that I encountered in the project. I was close to giving up, had it not been for Prof. Tyrrell’s patience and encouraging words. I also spoke to my Neural Networks professor and some friends for advice and learned a lot. In the end, I decided to use transfer learning, which ended up giving me very fruitful results.

More than technical knowledge, I learned how to stick with tough projects and what to expect when navigating one. I found Prof. Tyrrell’s attitude towards failures in projects very inspiring, which gave me the confidence to persevere through. The experience, in my opinion, teaches you how tough research actually is, and more importantly, how you can still overcome challenges and only get better having gone through them.

 Manav Shah

Posted on

Grace Yu’s STA299 Journey

Hi everyone! My name is Grace Yu and I’m finishing my second year at the University of Toronto, pursuing a computer science specialist and a molecular genetics major. From September 2021 to April 2022, I was fortunate to have the opportunity to do a STA299 project with Professor Tyrrell through the Research Opportunity Program. I am excited to share my experience with you all!

My project was landmarking with reduced sample size in MSK ultrasound images for knees. Similar to many other ROP students, this was my first research experience. Prior to this project, I have no idea about how machine learning works. However, I am always interested in the intersection between computer science and medical field, and that’s what drives me in this opportunity.

The start of the project was interesting but not easy. There were many times I did not know if I was doing the right thing, or if I was making the efforts towards the correct path. Luckily, Professor Tyrrell, and people in the lab were always very patient and helpful. I begin by reading some research papers on developing new semi-supervised learning models, but found them difficult to comprehend and time-consuming. Mauro kindly provided the suggestions on which parts to focus when doing the literature research, and advised me to pay more attention in selecting a model instead of focusing on the technical details about how the model is constructed. In addition, as I spent much time in choosing a model, I fell behind others. Professor Tyrrell reminded me of the timeline of my project and the next steps I should take on as soon as possible, which was to find a dataset. Fortunately, with the help of lab, we prepared a dataset together and my project went back to schedule. Looking back, I appreciated the period of exploring and experimenting, and the guidance provided by others. The starting point of a project can be difficult and sometimes we do not know what we are doing, but really that’s ok. For me, the time I spent in the beginning paid off by having extra suitable model and leading to a nice comparison. In addition, this experience also allows me to get on new projects or new fields more quickly.

I am very grateful to having the opportunity to work in the MiDATA lab this year. Not only did I had more understanding of statistical and computer science concepts, but also I learned the methods and process of conducting research. I would like to thank professor Tyrrell, Majid, Mauro, and Atsuhiro for their guidance and feedback on my way of doing this project. With this experience, I am more confidence and looking forward to applying what I have learned to my future research journey.

Grace Yu

Posted on

Linxi Chen’s STA399 Journey

Hi everyone! My name is Linxi Chen and I’m finishing my third year at the University of Toronto, pursuing a statistics specialist and a mathematics major. I did an STA399 research opportunity program with Professor Pascal Tyrrell from May 2021 – August 2021 and I am very grateful that I can have this opportunity. This project provided me an opportunity in understanding machine learning and scientific research. I would love to share my experience with you all.

Initially, I had no experience with machine learning and convolutional neural network and integrating machine learning with medical imaging was a brand-new area for me. Therefore, at the beginning of this project, I searched loads of information on machine learning to gain a general picture of this area. The first assignment in this project was to make a slide deck on machine learning in medical imaging. Extracting and simplifying the gathered information helped me understand this area more deeply. 

My research project is to find out an objective metric for heterogeneity and explore how dataset heterogeneity will affect heterogeneity as measured by the CNN training image features with sample size. At first, how to specifically define the term “heterogeneity” was a big challenge for me, since there are various kinds of definitions on Google and there was so little information that was directly related to my project. By comparing the information on websites and talking with Professor Tyrrell in the weekly meeting, I managed to define the term “between-group heterogeneity” as the extent to which the measurements of each group vary within a dataset, considering the mean of each subgroup and the grand mean of the population. Next, designing the experiment setup was also challenging, because I have to ensure the experiment steps are applicable and explicable. The datasets were separated into different groups according to the label of each image. We introduced new groups into the dataset while keeping the total sample size the same in each case. There was a total of four cases and the between-group heterogeneity was measured using Cochran’s Q which is a test statistic based on chi-squared distribution. The experiment setup was modified several times, because problems came up from time to time. For example, I planned to use multi-classification CNN model at first, but it showed that I have to use different number of output neurons for the model in different cases, which made the results not comparable. Professor Tyrrell and Mauro suggested I use a binary-classification model with pseudo label, which successfully solved this problem. Luckily, I found some code on the website and with the help of Mauro, I managed to come up with the code that was applicable to use. Next came the hardest part that I encountered. Although idealistically my expectation could be explained very well, still the output results I got were not what I expected. After modifying the model and the sample size several times, I finally managed to get the expected results.

Overall, I have learned a lot from this ROP program. With the guidance of Professor Tyrrell and the help of students in the lab, I have gained an in-depth understanding of machine learning, neural network and the process of scientific research. Also, I have become more familiar with writing a formal scientific research paper. The most valuable thing that I got from this experience is the ability of problem-solving and never be frustrated when things get wrong. I would like to thank Professor Tyrrell for giving me this opportunity to learn about scientific research and helping me overcome all the challenges that I encountered during this process. I’m very grateful that I have gained so many valuable skills in this project. Also, I would like to thank Mauro and all the members in the lab for giving me so much help with my project.

Linxi Chen

Posted on

Jacqueline Seal’s Journey in ROP299: Simulating clinical data!

Hi! My name is Jacqueline, and I’m going into my second year at U of T, pursuing a major in Computer Science and a specialist in Bioinformatics. This past summer, I had the opportunity to do a STA299 project with Professor Tyrrell through the Research Opportunity Program, and I’m excited to share my experiences here!

My ROP project for the summer dealt with the simulation of clinical variables relevant to detecting intra-articular hemarthrosis – basically bleeding into the joint – among patients with hemophilia, a disease where patients lack sufficient clotting proteins and are prone to regular, excessive bleeding. Since hemophilia is quite rare, clinical data is often unavailable and so simulation can help us understand what the real data might look like under different sets of plausible assumptions. The ultimate goal was to demonstrate that adding clinical data to Mauro’s existing binary CNN classifier for articular blood detection could boost model performance, as compared to a model trained exclusively on ultrasound images.

Having just completed first year, I went into this ROP with a very limited statistics background and was initially overwhelmed by all the stats jargon being used in lab meetings and in conversations with other lab members. Concepts like “odds ratios,” “ROC,” and “sensitivity analysis” were completely new to me, and I spent many hours just familiarizing myself with these fundamentals. 

After a bit of a slow start, I began my project by identifying physical presentation and clinical history variables to use in my simulation. I was fortunate enough to speak with two distinguished hematologists from Novo Nordisk, Drs. Brand-Staufer and Zak, about the features most relevant to diagnosing a joint bleed. Based on this conversation, I selected two of these variables as a starting point and simulated them according to assumed distributions. Next, I simulated the probability of an articular bleed based on a logistic regression model and used that probability to simulate the “true” presence of a bleed based on a Bernoulli distribution.

Then, I took a bit of a fun detour: figuring out how to best match simulated data to real-world bleed probabilities output by Mauro’s model. With some guidance from Professor Tyrrell, I developed a matching algorithm that allowed us to control the strength of the positive correlation between clinical simulated probabilities and classifier probabilities. Perhaps the most difficult part of my project was ensuring that the simulated dataset captured the desired relationships between my explanatory variables and between each explanatory variable and the response variables. Thanks to the advice of Guan and Sylvia, however, I was able to verify these relationships and report on them in a statistically sound manner.

Despite all the obstacles I encountered along the way, despite changing the details of my methodology several times, despite making slow progress and occasionally feeling like I was going in circles, I’m very grateful to have had this opportunity. Not only did I gain a greater understanding of important statistical concepts and greater familiarity with machine learning techniques, but I also got first-hand experience navigating the research process, from beginning to end. Ultimately, my experience in the MiDATA lab was simultaneously challenging and rewarding, and I would like to thank Dr. Tyrrell for all his guidance this summer – whether it was setting up impromptu meetings to discuss unexpected issues in my data, providing feedback on my results, or simply sharing humorous anecdotes in our weekly lab meetings. Regardless of where this next year takes me, I’m confident that I’ll carry the lessons I learned this summer with me.

Jacqueline Seal

Posted on

Jihong Huang’s ROP399 Journey

Hi, my name is Jihong Huang and I have finished my third year in computer science and statistics at the University of Toronto. During this summer, I had the great chance to work on my ROP399 project under the guide of Dr. Pascal Tyrell. In such a pandemic, everything was a bit different from usual, including this program. Still, I would like to share my experience and lessons from this summer with you!

After three years in the university and so many different courses in statistics and computer science, I thought that I was totally prepared to take a try in some research projects with knowledge learnt in lectures. However, it turned out that my thoughts were completely wrong! Everything was different from the lectures, where professors will teach step by step with detailed notes. I needed to create my own proposal and design the experiments, independently like a scholar instead of a student. Despite Dr. Tyrrell’s help, I struggled to figure out my schedule for the project. Such an experience was quite unique and special to me compared with time in lecture assignments.

After all the setups, I began to handle the coding part of my project. I picked YOLOv3 as my application of bounding box regression. YOLOv3 is one of the most popular bounding box regression algorithms and it already has excellent performances in many fields. At the same time, it has its complex structures and mechanisms that are longer and more complicated than any code that I have ever learnt. It looks like only the combination of classification and localization, where each single algorithm is easy to understand but the combination is much more advanced than my lectures notes! It took me weeks to roughly figure out its mechanism. Then, I devoted myself to debugging the code. That was difficult, as I was not familiar with most of the packages used. Some issues were caused by different versions of packages, while some were made by subtle wrong code. The adjustments of hyperparameters were also annoying as I usually could not find the optimal solutions for them. Thanks to the great help from Mauro, I finally made my code work on the server successfully.

At the end of the whole trip in my project, I gained a lot of advanced knowledge about bounding box regression and many relating packages, which I would probably never touch before my graduation if I did not take this project. However, my most precious lessons are not about any specific coding ability. The most important lesson is what scientific research is and how it should be done. I learnt that it is very important to make a clear and specific proposal as the plan in the beginning as it would provide the guidelines for any further experiments on coding. Otherwise, it would be easy to go off track and lose the initial goal when thousands of lines of code overwhelm. Also, there could always be failures in scientific research. I spent more than half of my time making and fixing mistakes during the project, which frustrated me a lot in the process. My final conclusion was suggesting that the algorithm selected was not performing well. But they were all common in scientific research. As we learn from failures, the failures are meaningful, and we could make further progress based on them. Thanks to the help from Dr. Tyrrell and all other lab members, it was them that helped me out of frustration during the project and offered me valuable advice.

After this project of three months, I learnt a lot from my first try in the world of scientific research, including coding skills and scientific spirits. This experience provided me with important guidance on my future direction of study and I think all the time and efforts are worthwhile.

– Jihong Huang

Posted on

Rui Zhu’s ROP399 Journey

I am Rui Zhu. I’ve just completed my third year in the computer science program. I’ve been working in Dr. Tyrrell’s lab on my ROP399 project in the past summer, which is a new and wonderful experience for me.

When I am writing down this reflection, and at some other decision-making moment in the future, it reminds me of the interview with Dr. Tyrrell, where he asked me why I chose his lab and why he chose me. I had tons of reasons for choosing his lab. However, honestly, it was hard for me to put up a whole sentence to answer why he would choose me. “I haven’t done research before, and everything needs a start,” I remember I said unconfidently, “so I need this chance to see if I am really interested in it and see how it goes”. Fortunately, I received Dr. Tyrrell’s offer a few days after the interview, and my very first research experience started.

My ROP project is on imperfect gold standard, which is the consensus of the readers. More specifically, the project is about training models on dataset labelled by readers who make mistakes. At first, I started by reading a lot of papers on robust learning. However, when I had my first meeting with Dr. Tyrrell and Atsuhiro, who kindly helped me with my project, I could not answer what is the definition of imperfect gold standard and why we need consensus of the readers. Atsuhiro helped me out. He explained the problem in real-world applications, where multiple readers annotate a huge dataset without looking at each other’s labels, because it is time-consuming and costly. I learnt the lesson that doing research starts by thinking why I am doing this rather than thinking how to do it. I kept getting questions like why my project is meaningful.

After sorting my mind, I began writing my premise, purpose, hypothesis, and objectives. I thought it was difficult to write up a whole page for these things, but after finding out that I should not assume people know why I am doing the project, I explained everything to readers in my introduction. It was easier than I thought to put up a whole page. After finishing my premise, purpose, hypothesis, and objectives, I combined them together to be a full introduction. Everything flowed like water.

When I was writing the actual code for my project, not many difficulties were met, as I was getting help from Atsuhiro and Mauro. I wanted to thank them for their help. Mauro taught me how to use Pytorch Lightning, which structured Pytorch code in a way easy to understand. Atsuhiro helped me confirm my experimental methodology and gave me guidance on what robust learning techniques to use for my project. Moreover, I started very early to familiarize myself with the code.

Overall, the journey on my summer ROP research was wonderful. I learnt how to start research from scratch and some knowledge in robust learning, although I am only scratching the surface of it. It was a pleasure for me to work in Dr. Tyrrell’s lab this summer. I look forward to what I can do in the future in the world of research.

– Rui Zhu

Posted on

Qianyu Fan’s ROP299 Experience

My name is Qianyu Fan, and I finished my first year at the University of Toronto, pursuing a statistics specialist. This summer I was given the incredible opportunity to work in Dr. Tyrrell’s lab for the ROP299 course. These four months, I have gone through pain and suffering, underwent a metamorphosis, and finally reaped the fruits.

I still remembered that I promised Professor Tyrrell during the interview that I would put twice as much effort as others to complete scientific research. Even if I had no experience with machine learning and neural networks, even if I hadn’t heard of them, the professor was welcome to accept me! During the weekly meetings, terminologies were hard for me to understand, though I tried to research them afterward. And so, I began my research in a daze.

Early on, I floundered to find a focus. The topic “Compare Image Similarity” is huge, where I could do the research on many sides. For instance, we could use different distance metrics to explore the similarities between synthetic and real images. Also, whether replacing real with synthetic images will improve the model accuracy in the training process is a meaningful topic. Due to many interesting ideas for the project, I was lost, and the proposal had been constantly revised. As other ROP students were starting to write their projects, I was still stuck in the proposal and was anxious about the progress. The professor understood my situation and helped me redefine my direction, because he cared about what the students learned in the course. So, my theme was: Comparison of Two Augmentation Methods in Improving Detection Accuracy of Hemarthrosis. We used data synthesis and traditional augmentation techniques to explore and compare the recognition accuracy with increasing proportions of augmented data.

As the deadline was approaching, I had the idea of giving up due to no results. Once in the private meeting with the professor, I broke down and cried. What a shame! He gave me much support and understood my frustration. Mauro was very helpful in offering the datasets as well as allowing me to use his codes and solving my questions. Thanks to their help, my thinking became clear, and I was able to complete the project on time.

A tortuous but unforgettable journey is over. I have learned a lot of things in this ROP course, from machine learning to scientific research. This will be an asset in my life. I appreciate that the professor gave me this opportunity and that I was able to complete my project.

Qianyu Fan

Posted on

Jenny Du’s ROP299 Journey: Telling apart the real and the fake!

My name is Jenny Du, and I have just wrapped up my ROP299 project in the Tyrrell Lab, as well as my second year at the University of Toronto, pursuing a bioinformatics specialist. Looking back, it was a bumpy ride, but in the end, this journey was very rewarding and has taught me a lot of things on both machine learning topics as well as the process of scientific research.

Like most of the other ROP299 students, I had no experience with machine learning and neural networks. Despite doing some research beforehand, I found myself googling what everyone was talking about during the weekly meetings (thankfully, they were online) to make sure I was not completely lost. None of my first-year courses had prepared me for these kinds of things! And so, with some uncertainties in my heart, I started my ROP journey.

I decided on my overall research topic fairly early, but the details were adjusted several times as I progressed through my project. My project is about coming up with a way to quantitatively assess a set of synthetic ultrasound images in terms of how “realistic” they look compared to the real ultrasound images. “Realism” here is defined as whether the synthetic images can be used as training images in replacement of the real images without creating too big of an impact on the machine learning algorithm. At first, I came up with a naïve proposal: I will build an algorithm that differentiates real and synthetic ultrasound images, and if the algorithm can classify the two kinds (with high accuracies), then it means that the synthetic images are not realistic, and vice versa. In the weekly meeting, Dr. Tyrrell immediately pointed out why this wouldn’t work. In my proposal, a low accuracy could mean that the synthetic and the real images are very similar, but it could also mean that the algorithm itself is terrible. For example, if my algorithm has 50% accuracy, then it is basically randomly guessing each image, like a coin toss, so its classification is unreliable, to say the least. He suggested that I look online to see how others have done it. There was very little information that directly relates to what I’m doing, but eventually I was able to come up with a plan to extract features from the images using a pre-trained CNN model and measure the cosine similarity score between two images and graph these values into a histogram to see their distribution. Dr. Tyrrell also suggested that I compare the distributions at different equivalence margins to determine how big a mean difference is acceptable.

Thankfully, I was able to find some code online that I was able to use in my project with minor changes, and I was able to produce some distribution data fairly quickly. Then, I encountered what I considered to be the hardest part of my entire project: to statistically interpret and discuss my data and create a conclusion out of it. Since I am not a statistics student, and so my knowledge of statistics is limited to one stats course I took as a part of my program requirements. It took a while for me to learn all these statistical concepts and understand why each is needed in my project.

This year was especially interesting since everything was online. Despite not being able to see each other face-to-face, I was still able to receive much support from Dr. Tyrrell and other students in the lab. Mauro was very helpful in preparing the datasets for my project as well as answering any problems related to the codes. Guan also helped to check my statistical calculations and clarifying some hard concepts. I have also made great friends with the other ROP students this year, and hopefully we will be able to see each other in person when the school re-opens.

Overall, this journey was a wonderful experience, and I have learned many things from it. Not only did I got some familiarity with machine learning topics and their application in medicine, but I have also gained experience in the general academic research process, from coming up with a topic to the actual implementation to the final reports. There were challenges along the way, but in the end, it was very rewarding. I am extremely thankful to Dr. Tyrrell for the guidance and support and am grateful for this opportunity.

Jenny Du

Posted on

Parinita Edke’s ROP experience in the Tyrrell Lab!

Hi! My name is Parinita Edke and I’m finishing my third year at UofT, specializing in Computer Science with a minor in Statistics. I did a STA399Y research project with Professor Tyrrell from September 2020 – April 2021 and I am excited to share my experience in the lab!

I have always been interested in medicine and the applications of Computer Science and Statistics to solve problems in the medical field. I was looking out for opportunities to do research in this intersection and was excited when I saw Professor Tyrrell’s ROP posting. I applied prior to the second-round deadline and waited to hear back. After almost 2 weeks past the deadline, I had still not heard back and decided to follow up on the status of my application. I quickly received a reply from Professor Tyrrell that he had already picked his students prior to receiving my application. While this was extremely disappointing, I thanked Professor Tyrrell for his time and expressed that I was still interested in working with him during the year and attached my application package to the email. I was not really expecting anything coming out of this, so I was extremely happy when I received an invite to an interview! After a quick chat with Professor Tyrrell about my goals and fit for the lab, I was accepted as an ROP student!

Soon after being accepted, I joined my first lab meeting where I was quickly lost in the technical machine learning terms, the statistical concepts and the medical imaging terminology used. I ended the meeting determined to really begin understanding what machine learning was all about!

This marked the beginning of the long and challenging journey through my project. When I decided on my project, it seemed interesting as solving the problem allowed for some cool questions to be answered. The task was to detect the presence of blood in ultrasound images of the knee joint; my project was to determine if Fourier Transformation can be used to generate features to perform the task at hand well. It seemed quite straightforward at first – simply generate Fourier Transformed features and run a classification model to get the outputs, right? After completing the project, I am here to tell you that it was far from being straightforward. It was more like a zigzag progress pattern through the project. The first challenge that I faced was understanding the theory behind the Fourier Transform and how it applies to the task at hand. This took me quite some time to fully grasp and was definitely one of the more challenging parts of the project. The next challenge was figuring out the steps and the things I would need for my project. Rajshree, a previous lab member, had done some initial work using a CNN+SVM model. I first tried to replicate what Rajshree had done in order to create a baseline to compare my approach to. It took me some time to understand what each line of code did within Rajshree’s model but after I was able to get it to work, I felt amazing! Reading through Rajshree’s code gave me more experience in understanding the common Python libraries used in machine learning, so when I built my model, it was much quicker! When I ran my model for the first time, I felt incredible! The process was incredibly frustrating at times, but when I saw results for the first time, I felt like all this struggle was worth it. Throughout this process of figuring out the project steps and building the model, Mauro was always there to help, always being enthusiastic when answering any questions I had and giving me encouragement to keep going.

Throughout the process, Professor Tyrrell was always there as well – during our weekly ROP meetings, he always reminded us to think about the big picture of what our projects were about and the objectives we were trying to accomplish. I definitely veered off in the wrong direction at times, but Professor Tyrrell was quick to pull me back and redirect me in the right direction. Without this guidance, I would not have been able to finish and execute the project in the way that I did and am proud of.

Looking back at the year, I am astonished at the number of things I have learned and how much I have grown. Everything that I learned, not only about machine learning, but about writing a research paper, learning from others and your own mistakes, collaborating with others, learning from even more of my own mistakes, and persevering when things get tough will carry with me throughout the rest of my undergraduate studies and the rest of my professional career.

Thank you, Professor Tyrrell, for taking a chance on me. He could have simply passed on my application but the fact that he took a chance with me and accepted me into the course lead to such an invaluable experience for me which I truly appreciate. The experiences and the connections I have made in this lab have been a highlight of my year, and I hope to keep contributing to the lab in the future!

Parinita Edke

Posted on

Stanley Hua in ROP299: Joining the Tyrrell Lab during a Pandemic

My name is Stanley Hua, and I’ve just finished my 2nd year in the bioinformatics program. I have also just wrapped up my ROP299 with Professor Pascal. Though I have yet to see his face outside of my monitor screen, I cannot begin to express how grateful I am for the time I’ve been spending at the lab. I remember very clearly the first question he asked me during my interview: “Why should I even listen to you?” Frankly, I had no good answer, and I thought that the meeting didn’t go as well as I’d hoped. Nevertheless, he gave me a chance, and everything began from there.

Initially, I got involved with quality assessment of Multiple Sclerosis and Vasculitis 3D MRI images along with Jason and Amar. Here, I got introduced to the many things Dmitrii can complain about taking brain MRI images. Things such as scanner bias, artifacts, types of imaging modalities and prevalence of disease play a role in how we can leverage these medical images in training predictive models.

My actual ROP, however, revolved around a niche topic in Mauro and Amar’s project. Their project sought to understand the effect of dataset heterogeneity in training Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) by cluster analysis of CNN-extracted image features. Upon extraction of image features using a trained CNN, we end up with high-dimensional vectors representing each image. As a preprocessing step, the dimensionality of the features is reduced by transformation via Principal Component Analysis, then selecting a number of principal components (PC) to keep (e.g. 10 PCs). The question must then be asked: How many principal components should we use in their methodology? Though it’s a very simple question, I took way too many detours to answer this question. I looked at the difference between standardization vs. no standardization before PCA, nonlinear dimensionality reduction techniques (e.g. autoencoder) and comparisons of neural network image representation (via SVCCA) among other things. Finally, I proposed an equally simple method for determining the number of PCs to use in this context, which is the minimum number of PCs that gives the most frequent resulting value (from the original methodology).

Regardless of the difficulty of the question I sought to answer, I learned more about practices in research, and I even learned about how research and industry intermingle. I only have Professor Pascal to thank for always explaining things in a way that a dummy such as me would understand. Moreover, Professor Pascal always focused on impact; is what you’re doing meaningful and what are its applications?

 I believe that the time I spent with the lab has been worthwhile. It was also here that I discovered that my passion to pursue data science trumps my passion to pursue medical school (big thanks to Jason, Indranil and Amar for breaking my dreams). Currently, I look towards a future, where I can drive impact with data; maybe even in the field of personalized medicine or computational biology. Whoever is reading this, feel free to reach out! Hopefully, I’ll be the next Elon Musk by then…

Transiently signing out,

Stanley Bryan Z. Hua